<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TopicObserver.com &#187; web-standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/tag/web-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.topicobserver.com/blog</link>
	<description>Trond Pettersen on Web Development and Topic Maps</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 22:18:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SOS Barnebyer: A Hint of Fresh Air (even on the Web)</title>
		<link>http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/uncategorized/2009/sos-barnebyer-a-hint-of-fresh-air-even-on-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/uncategorized/2009/sos-barnebyer-a-hint-of-fresh-air-even-on-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trond</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web-standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/?p=353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nowadays I seldom complain to web site owners about browser (or rather, standards) compability issues, mainly because the standard answer seemed to be &#8220;Sorry, but we can&#8217;t support ever browser out there.&#8221;. So when I contacted SOS Barnebyer about a web form that had no submit button when viewed in Firefox on Ubuntu 8.04 a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/uncategorized/2009/sos-barnebyer-a-hint-of-fresh-air-even-on-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Microsoftish Perspective on Standards</title>
		<link>http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/web-development/2008/a-microsoftish-perspective-on-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/web-development/2008/a-microsoftish-perspective-on-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trond</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet-explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web-standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/?p=102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the MSDNTechNet Live program for Stavanger, September 4 (translation and emphasis by me): Internet Explorer 8 for Developers Internet Explorer 8 will be released soon. It is then nice to know what kind of considerations one have to take when developing standard oriented web applications… There are standards for that?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/web-development/2008/a-microsoftish-perspective-on-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web Developers Don&#8217;t Know HTML</title>
		<link>http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/web-development/2008/web-developers-dont-know-html/</link>
		<comments>http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/web-development/2008/web-developers-dont-know-html/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trond</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web-standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent article, IAllenkelhet.no (Norwegian) claims that a survey conducted last year revealed that while 90% of us expect web developers to have expert knowledge about HTML, a mere 35% of the developers actually do. Even fewer know much about WAI or WCAG. Unfortunately, this is probably very close to the truth. I believe [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/web-development/2008/web-developers-dont-know-html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Explorer 8 Beta 1</title>
		<link>http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/web-development/2008/internet-explorer-8-beta-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/web-development/2008/internet-explorer-8-beta-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 07:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trond</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acid3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web-standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/web-development/2008/internet-explorer-8-beta-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first Internet Explorer 8 beta version was released yesterday. As far as the Acid3 test goes, it made it all the way to 10/100 before it crashed. Restarted, opened up the previous page (Acid3 test) and crashed. Restarted, opened up the previous page (Acid3 test) and crashed. Restarted, &#8230; Good start Well, at least [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/web-development/2008/internet-explorer-8-beta-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acid3 Browser Test</title>
		<link>http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/web-development/2008/acid3-browser-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/web-development/2008/acid3-browser-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 12:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trond</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acid3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web-standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/web-development/2008/acid3-browser-test/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Acid 3 test went public yesterday. As far as I know, IE6 wont make it to 100. On a related note, the IE team have been listening to the critics and are changing the default behavior of IE8 to &#8220;actual standards mode&#8221;. Good news. Kudos to the IE team for caring.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/web-development/2008/acid3-browser-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why validate HTML?</title>
		<link>http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/web-development/2007/why-validate-html/</link>
		<comments>http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/web-development/2007/why-validate-html/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trond</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semantic-html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[validation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web-standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/web-development/2007/why-validate-html/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent blog posting &#8211; Er validering verdiløst? &#8211; Chrisitian Johansen argues that it is important to create valid HTML and that valid HTML is a good indication of high quality code. I agree that although valid HTML in itself does not guarantee a good product, it is important to write valid HTML. Both [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/web-development/2007/why-validate-html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Semantic HTML for Usable Web Sites</title>
		<link>http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/web-development/2007/semantic-html/</link>
		<comments>http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/web-development/2007/semantic-html/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 13:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Trond</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Usability & Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semantic-html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[validation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web-standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/web-development/usability/2007/semantic-html/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although the post title might seem a little ironic in that there is not much semantics to HTML or XHTML, I do feel like writing a little piece about how to correctly use (X)HTML. Hopefully, it might help you understand that even valid (X)HTML can be "incorrect" (X)HTML.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.topicobserver.com/blog/web-development/2007/semantic-html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
